Your better off using it to mine cryptonight light like Aeon or TRTL where you should get about 190hs or so. How Pools and Mining Software Calculate HashrateYour MBA will do about 45hs on xmr (35 with the Monero GUI ). Please be advised when using these types of applications that you will need to disable any antivirus you might be currently using. Here is the best Bitcoin Mining Software for 2019 based on ease of use, performance, and features. Disclaimer: Buy Bitcoin Worldwide is not offering, promoting, or encouraging the purchase, sale, or trade of any security or commodity.Top 7 Bitcoin Mining Software For 2019. Best Monero Mining Software Is a good way to convert ETH into other coins, and is an easy place to sell ETH to your bank account in the USA, Europe, Australia and Singapore.
Best Monero Mining Software 2018 Software Is InvolvedSimple like iOS, yet powerful like a Mac, this app gives you all the options. How to Calculate Monero.and DogeCoin, VertCoin, QuarkCoin, MaxCoin, more. As far as software is involved, XMR-STAK-NVIDIA can be used, but CCMiner is deemed as a better option. Test resultsIt all depends on your funds. Best Ethereum Mining Software for Nvidia. The stock Fan curve on a Mac is a joke for anything other than web browsing.It’s important to look at the hashrate reported by the pool rather than by mining software. RANDOMX BENCHMARKS FOR MONERO MINING Monero Price: 235.97 &dollar , 201.68 , BTC-XMR: 0.005526 - Time: 2021-Sep-25 01:03 UTCClearly, any miner would like to know which mining software is the best, the most reliable, and has the highest hash rate. Test resultsGPU and CPU Benchmarks for Monero Mining. Best Ethereum mining software for AMD.There are new software versions available. “T-rex is the fastest, Phoenix overstates its hashrate, Gminer is the best of all, lolMiner is the most reasonable option, nothing compares to TeamRedMiner, you can’t figure out NBMiner if you’re not Chinese” – that’s what we hear all the time.What is wrong with our old experiment and why are we holding the new one? Don’t be fooled by the hash rate displayed in your rig console as it’s completely irrelevant.So-called reported hashrate has nothing to do with your profit.We regularly see debates about the best mining software on Youtube, Reddit, in Telegram chats, and on forums.The more shares mining software sends to the pool, the higher the reward it gets. How do you detect the best? Simple. Ethereum price is at its record high and you’ve got to make the most of your mining hardware.We tested the best ETH mining software to see which is the best of the best. The experiment lasted 3 hours, so a developer’s fee was mined multiple times.We chose two configured rigs for the experiment: one with 9 Nvidia 1660Ti graphics cards, the other with graphics cards. It doesn’t matter for how long mining software is mining to the developer’s wallet. We counted only those shares that reached the pool and appeared in the miner balance. It is an optimal value to maximize the number of shares and make sure that mining software handles the load and the processor doesn’t slow down testing.3 hours in this test pool equal 408.75 hours (17 days) in a real pool. We set it at 64M for the test pool, which is 136x lower so that we get a lot of shares and don’t have to keep the experiment running for months. The experiment starts when mining software launches.We created an Ethereum pool with a low share difficulty.You can read more about shares and share difficulty in this post: What is Share and the Share Difficulty When You Are Mining at the Pool.Current share difficulty in the Ethereum pool is 8.72G. Rigs were operative for 3 hours for each program. Hashrate from mining software, that is what you see in the program when it’s running.We took it from the miner log at the very end of the experiment. It’s an average hashrate obtained during the 3-hour experiment. Plus, the final table features two types of hashrate: ![]() Say mining software sends 1200 shares in 10 minutes. Each share sent to the pool has a difficulty no less than 64M (share difficulty is set by the pool). It means that your mining software uses your graphics cards to go through 200 million solutions per second.On the contrary, hashrate in the pool needs to be calculated. 9 GPUs: Nvidia MSI Gaming X GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB Testing NVIDIA Mining Software Blockchain remembers everything. We multiply 2 shares by a share difficulty of 64M and get a hashrate of 128 MH/s.In cryptocurrency mining everything can be explained and calculated. ![]() LolMiner released its Nvidia mining software just a few months ago, but it already surpassed the most popular mining software Phoenix in terms of efficiency.Phoenix and NBMiner came last. If you choose Gminer or T-rex, you gain more.LolMiner came fourth. As you can see, if mining software is free, it doesn’t mean that you get more profit. It doesn’t charge a developer’s fee, so hashrates in the program and in the pool are almost identical with a 0.01% difference. Usually less than a minute every hour.The only open-source mining software Ethminer came third. Java for mac 1058 downloadEth: Average speed (5 min): 284.557 MH/s We think you should only look at effective speed. Phoenix shows hashrate in 3 ways: speed, average speed (5 min), effective speed. This time Effective Speed was 276.86 MH/s which seems accurate and corresponds to the number of shares in the pool. As to Phoenix, we already established last time that we should look not at its Eth speed, but at its Eth: Effective speed. 4 GPUs: AMD Power Color RX 5700 Reference with Micron memory, flashed into XTBest Ethereum mining software for AMD. Testing AMD Mining Software We checked the log and didn’t see any rejected or stale shares.It means that Phoenix and NBMiner overstate their hashrates which is in no way beneficial to you. Hashrate reported by NBMiner was higher than that of other mining programs. Confidence Level and Future TestingThis time our experiment was 5 times more accurate than last time (we tested 5 times more shares). We’ve sent a bug report to the GMiner developers and we hope to see this mining software in our future AMD tests. Phoenix hashrate was too high as always, while effective speed was extremely accurate: 214.58 MH/s.We remind you to look only at Effective Speed if you use Phoenix Miner.NBMiner came fourth lagging behind TeamRedMiner by a margin of 10%.We wanted to test GMiner with AMD video cards as well but it failed to start most likely due to the high memory overclocking. TRM hashrates in the miner and in the pool are almost identical (it is possible that TeamRedMiner doesn’t count the dev fee when it calculates hashrate).Phoenix and lolMiner came second and third with a tiny difference. This time it’s even more distant from its competitors with a hashrate 5% higher than that of the runner-up. With that being said, we do want to hold new experiments in the future, with upgraded mining software and higher accuracy.It’s worth mentioning that if mining software developers report their hash rate honestly and don’t have errors in the code, you can trust the hashrate in the program when you are choosing mining software. By the time we finish such an experiment, developers will release upgrades and the experiment will become useless. It means that testing for each piece of mining software would take a month! Way too much. If you look at the results, it’s clear that 1% could make a huge difference.If we want to have a truly accurate experiment, mining software should send 10 million shares each. They say that it’s important to consider mining as a Poisson process with all consequent measurement errors.In our experiment with 50 thousand shares we have a confidence level of slightly less than 99%. TeamReadMiner shared their thoughts about comparing mining software.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorTracy ArchivesCategories |